Week 1-3 //// See how easy it is to publish a book / What are the pros and cons of using Naver versus Google for research purpose?

How easy is it to publish book?

Rather than simply looking at the order or process of publishing a book before looking at it, I looked at how possible it would be if I were to publish book in Korea now

First, the online process

If I want publish a short book, Simply SNS or the online sites I can publish in Korea are enough such as Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, Twitter and Kakao Talk.

If you write a little longer, you can also use portal websites such as Naver, Google and Daum.

Regardless of whether the content is credible or not, it is possible to make it real things if it has the proper writing skills

Second, the offline process.

I think that even if I don't just publish physical books(posts), simple communication with people is also the publishing of books.

Conversation with a close friend, conversation with a co-worker, and conversation with strangers are all I can do.

The reliability and credibility of the content here are not important.

It would be possible if you just had the right way of saying and the right way of speaking.

//////////////////////////////////////////////////////

What are the pros and cons of using Naver versus Google for research purpose?

What are the similarities and differences before listing the pros and cons of using Naver versus Google for research purpose.

First, it is the similarities of Naver and Google. Both are now representative portal websites that have access to the number of data on the Internet and are higher in accessibility and usefulness than other portal websites. There are also accumulated data over the past few decades and engineers' technical skills to use it.

Next, it is the differences of Naver and Google. Google is a ultra-large company based in the U.S., and Naver is a conglomerate based in South Korea. Both boast enormous capital and technological prowess, but to be exact, Google is overwhelming to Naver in terms of capital and technology. It is also Google that can say that Google is superior and is popular all over the world. However, Naver is also at an enormous level in Korea.

In research purpose, Naver’s pros are that is at least the fastest, easiest and most comfortable search tool in Korea. The representative language of the data is Korean, and most of the data is also written in Korean. Since there is a lot of use in Korea, it is well organized and developed according to the characteristics of Korea and the situation of Korea.

In research purpose, Naver’s cons are that the fairness or reliability of the data may be weak compared to Google, as Korea's views have been shown too much. In case of overseas news, there is a tendency to advocate and support Korea's position a little bit more, and there is clearly thing for distorting objective views. Although the data is vast, the fact that it is definitely small compared to Google

In research purpose, Google’s pros are that Google has enormous data. It accounts for most of the world's searches and has the right amount of data processing and utilization technology. It provides an environment where enough data is available worldwide and has the fastest and most accurate search capability.

In research purpose, Google’s cons are that Google has enormous data. Users who are not proficient in search technology will inevitably be exposed to a lot of unreliable data. In addition, as a major U.S. company, there is naturally a lot of data that speaks for and defends the U.S. position on global issues.