WEEK 2-2 : do you think sociologists should take side or try to be neutral?



I think sociologists don't necessarily have to be neutral. The process of sociologists choosing research methods and topics is said to be close to the subjective aspect, as they once learned by looking at the sociological method process.
Of course, there are benefits when they are neutral. For example, if someone says A-1 is correct and someone says A-2 is right, then they will both accept the possibility if they are neutral. In this regard, I think it would be good to have a neutral stance that is likely to embrace all possibilities.
However, if there is premise that they can  accept the opinions of others without forcing their own opinions, I think it would be better and not strange to stick to a position on one side because, there is a precondition that the subject has already intervened in the topic selection. 
If each sociologist studies it deeply with his opinion, acknowledges the part to be acknowledged and integrates it into one theory and one conclusion, it would be the best way. If you pursue a neutral stance 'that is good and this is good too', the depth would might to be a little shallow.
Of course, if you stick to your own opinion, corroborative bias will emerge, and if so, different consequences on one theory can spread to society, causing confusion to people.
But I think it's better to take sides if it has the premise that people with different opinions eventually recognize and integrate each other's opinions through discussion. In that case, they believe in-depth observation is possible on the basis of their different opinions.
[other good premise is adopted for neutral stance, then it can be better too.]
What I want to say after all, I think it's not bad to take sides because when I stick to my own opinions and discuss it, it makes people who are not sociologists think about more positions, and sociologists themselves think about which is better.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Introduction to the blog

This blog is a digital forum where students from Spring 2020 class in Invitation to Sociology at the Hanyang University in Korea will discuss their weekly readings and activities. Each week you are expected to post a a blog post on at least 3 pages worth of the readings assigned for next week on our blog (here)  and make a comment on another student's post. As you are expected to do the assigned readings FOR the lectures they are assigned to, you are expected to post your blog and comments BEFORE that lecture. Deadline: Saturday midnight, for main blog posts and Sunday, midnight for comments. Exception: blog posts for the first week can be posted during the first week of class, as if they were for the second week. An ideal commentary should be about third of a page in length (~200 words), divided intro three clearly labeled sections in which you: 1) summarize in your own words of materials you read; 2) mention of any new, interesting, or unusual items learned; 3) identify
Read more

W9. Introduction to Sociology / Deviance

Sum mary   Deviation refers to the act of violating cultural norms. Violating the law is usually called an official deviation, and the act of violating informal social norms is called an informal deviation. Deviation can vary considerably depending on culture. Deviations defined by sociologists have many forms. Merton suggested a type of deviant behavior. According to him, the type of deviation is presented based on two criteria. The first condition is the adherence to personal motivation or cultural goals. The second condition is the individual's belief in how to achieve the goal. By selecting these conditions as Yes or No, there are four types and one additional type. The four types appear to be suitability, innovation, realism, and retro. One additional type is "rebellion," which refers to an individual rejecting both cultural goals and means of achievement, replacing or creating new means and goals. Structural functionalism argues that deviant behavior plays an impo
Read more

Dramaturgy (Sociology)

1. Summary -       Dramaturgy is a sociological perspective commonly used in micro-social explanations of social interactions in everyday life. In drama sociology, it is argued that the elements of human interaction depend on time, place and courtesy. The dramatic view is one of several sociological paradigms separate from other sociological theories because it analyzes context rather than examining the causes of human behavior. In the dramatic model, social interaction is analyzed in such a way that people live their lives like actors acting on stage. There are also seven important factors identified by Goffman regarding performance. The steps represent three areas (front, back, outside) where you can find multiple individuals with different roles and information. Front stage is that part of the individual’s performance which regularly functions in a general and fixed fashion. The backstage allows the performer to relax, put his front down and escape the character without speaking
Read more